Wednesday, February 17, 2016

RTJ studbolt dia and length

berikut list diameter studbolt dan juga panjang studbolt untuk flange tipe RTJ. semoga dapat membantu


STUD BOLT SIZE AND LENGTH FOR RING TYPE JOINT (RTJ) FLANGE
size 150 300 600 900 1500 2500
1/2 Ø1/2" x 3" Ø1/2" x 3-1/4" Ø1/2" x 3-3/4" Ø3/4" x 4-3/4" Ø3/4" x 4-3/4" Ø3/4" x 5-3/4"
3/4 Ø1/2" x 3" Ø5/8" x 4" Ø5/8" x 3-3/4" Ø3/4" x 4-3/4" Ø3/4" x 5" Ø3/4" x 5-3/4"
1 Ø1/2" x 3-3/4" Ø5/8" x 4-1/4" Ø5/8" x 3-3/4" Ø7/8" x 5-1/2" Ø7/8" x 5-1/2" Ø7/8" x 6-1/4"
1-1/4 Ø1/2" x 3-3/4" Ø5/8" x 4-1/4" Ø5/8" x 4-1/2" Ø7/8" x 5-1/2" Ø7/8" x 5-1/2" Ø1" x 7"
1-1/2 Ø1/2" x 4" Ø5/8" x 4-3/4" Ø5/8" x 4-3/4" Ø1" x 6" Ø1" x 6" Ø1-1/8" x 7-3/4"
2 Ø5/8" x 4-1/4" Ø3/4" x 5" Ø3/4" x 5-1/2" Ø7/8" x 6-1/4" Ø7/8" x 6-1/4" Ø1-1/8" x 8"
3 Ø5/8" x 4-3/4" Ø3/4" x 5-1/2" Ø3/4" x 5-3/4" Ø7/8" x 6-1/2" Ø1-1/8" x 7-1/4" Ø1-1/4" x 9-3/4"
4 Ø5/8" x 4-3/4" Ø3/4" x 5-3/4" Ø7/8" x 6" Ø1-1/8" x 7-1/2" Ø1-1/4" x 8-1/4" Ø1-1/2" x 11-1/2"
6 Ø3/4" x 5" Ø3/4" x 6-1/4" Ø1" x 7-1/4" Ø1-1/8" x 8-1/4" Ø1-3/8" x 11" Ø2" x 15"
8 Ø3/4" x 5-1/4" Ø7/8" x 6-3/4" Ø1-1/8" x 8-1/4" Ø1-3/8" x 9-1/2" Ø1-5/8" x 12-1/2" Ø2" x 16-1/2"
10 Ø7/8" x 5-3/4" Ø1" x 7-1/2" Ø1-1/4" x 9-1/4" Ø1-3/8" x 10" Ø1-7/8" x 14-1/4" Ø2-1/2" x 21"
12 Ø7/8" x 5-3/4" Ø1-1/8" x 7-3/4" Ø1-1/4" x 9-1/2" Ø1-3/8" x 10-3/4" Ø2" x 16" Ø2-3/4" x 23"
14 Ø1" x 6-1/4" Ø1-1/8" x 8-1/4" Ø1-3/8" x 10" Ø1-1/2" x 11-3/4" Ø2-1/4" x 17-1/2"  
16 Ø1" x 6-1/2" Ø1-1/4" x 8-3/4" Ø1-1/2" x 10-3/4" Ø1-5/8" x 12-1/4" Ø2-1/2" x 19"  
18 Ø1-1/8" x 7" Ø1-1/4" x 9" Ø1-5/8" x 11-1/4" Ø1-7/8" x 14" Ø2-3/4" x 21"  
20 Ø1-1/8" x 7-1/4" Ø1-1/4" x 9-1/2" Ø1-5/8" x 12-1/4" Ø2" x 14-3/4" Ø3" x 23"  

Tuesday, February 16, 2016

studbolt length and size

Bagi rekan2 yang kesulitan untuk menentukan ukuran studbolt, dibawah ini dapat digunakan sebagai acuan.


STUD BOLT SIZE AND LENGTH FOR RAISE FACE (RF) FLANGE
size 150 300 600 900 1500 2500
1/2 Ø1/2" x 2-3/4 Ø1/2" x 3-1/4" Ø1/2" x 3-3/4" Ø3/4" x 4-3/4" Ø3/4" x 4-3/4" Ø3/4" x 5-3/4"
3/4 Ø1/2" x 2-3/4 Ø5/8" x 3-1/2" Ø5/8" x 4" Ø3/4" x 4-3/4" Ø3/4" x 5" Ø3/4" x 5-3/4"
1 Ø1/2" x 3" Ø5/8" x 3-1/2" Ø5/8" x 4-1/4" Ø7/8" x 5-1/2" Ø7/8" x 5-1/2" Ø7/8" x 6-1/2"
1-1/4 Ø1/2" x 3" Ø5/8" x 3-3/4" Ø5/8" x 4-1/2" Ø7/8" x 5-1/2" Ø7/8" x 5-1/2" Ø1" x 6-3/4"
1-1/2 Ø1/2" x 3-1/2" Ø5/8" x 3-3/4" Ø5/8" x 4-3/4" Ø1" x 6" Ø1" x 6" Ø1-1/8" x 7-1/2"
2 Ø5/8" x 3-1/2" Ø5/8" x 4-1/2" Ø3/4" x 4-3/4" Ø7/8" x 6-1/4" Ø7/8" x 6-1/4" Ø1" x 7-3/4"
3 Ø5/8" x 3-3/4" Ø3/4" x 4-1/2" Ø3/4" x 5-1/4" Ø7/8" x 6-1/4" Ø1-1/8" x 7-1/2" Ø1-1/4" x 9-1/2"
4 Ø5/8" x 3-3/4" Ø3/4" x 4-3/4" Ø7/8" x 5-3/4" Ø1-1/8" x 7-1/4" Ø1-1/4" x 8-1/4" Ø1-1/2" x 10-3/4"
6 Ø3/4" x 4-1/4" Ø3/4" x 5-1/2" Ø1" x 7" Ø1-1/8" x 8-1/4" Ø1-3/8" x 10-3/4" Ø2" x 13-3/4"
8 Ø3/4" x 4-1/2" Ø7/8" x 5-3/4" Ø1-1/8" x 8-1/4" Ø1-3/8" x 9-1/4" Ø1-5/8" x 12" Ø2" x 15-3/4"
10 Ø7/8" x 5" Ø1" x 6-3/4" Ø1-1/4" x 9" Ø1-3/8" x 9-3/4" Ø1-7/8" x 13-3/4" Ø2-1/2" x 20"
12 Ø7/8" x 5-1/4" Ø1-1/8" x 7-1/4" Ø1-1/4" x 9-1/4" Ø1-3/8" x 10-1/2" Ø2" x 15-1/4" Ø2-3/4" x 22"
14 Ø1" x 5-3/4" Ø1-1/8" x 7-1/2" Ø1-3/8" x 9-3/4" Ø1-1/2" x 11-1/4" Ø2-1/4" x 16-1/2"
16 Ø1" x 6" Ø1-1/4" x 8" Ø1-1/2" x 10-1/4" Ø1-5/8" x 11-3/4" Ø2-1/2" x 18"
18 Ø1-1/8" x 6-1/2" Ø1-1/4" x 8-1/4" Ø1-5/8" x 11-1/4" Ø1-7/8" x 11-3/4" Ø2-3/4" x 20"
20 Ø1-1/8" x 7" Ø1-1/4" x 8-3/4" Ø1-5/8" x 11-3/4" Ø2" x 14" Ø3" x 22"

Monday, December 14, 2009

13 Simple Rules of Gym Etiquette

Imagine how is your feeling when you're running on treadmill and listening your favorite song from your i-Pod then suddenly someone near you yelling or singing loudly. Or maybe, this is worse if someone laughing at you just because you can't lift a 5 kilos dumbbell. How does it feel? Annoyed, isn't it?

Life is full with rules, not only at school, office or dining table. When you're at gym, there are some important rules or etiquettes that must be obeyed. Men's Guide this time will explain 13 fitness etiquette which you have to know so people won't go away from you at gym. Remember, some rules are not made to be broken!

  • Rules in Using Weight
    • Let's start it with a simple problem which actually has high etiquette. Sometimes you just left the weight bars just like that. Hey, not everyone can lift 100 kilos barbell at bench press like you!
    • Or when you finish with your dumbbell, you just left it on the floor. Inside the mess that you made, dumbbell on the floor can make someone stumbled.
    • Put dumbbell back on its place and put down the weight bars from its cross after you have done with them. Except if another player ask you to leave the dumbbell or the weight bars for him.
  • Lift Slowly, Drop Slowly
    • Gym isn't a place for a lifting weight contest where you can drop over your barbell or dumbbell just like that after you lift them! Drop them roughly can surprised people and also can hurt yourself or they around you. And, you don't want to be fined just because you break the gym's floor or break the barbell, do you?
  • Watch Your Mouth!
    • Don't yelling without reasons, it's clearly disturbing. Sometimes we need yelling to help us letting go a big power when doing hard exercise. But, if you yell when doing a little stretching, it's kind a weird, right?

      The second one is – even you already knew that they're not good to be yelled at – animals' name, disgusting things, bad words, in Indonesian, local, or foreign language, for mostly people can come out easily. It can make other people feel uncomfortable so, stop swearing!

  • Wear Your Suitable Clothes!
    • Jeans are casual but besides it's uncomfortable and less moving, it's really unproper to wear them for exercising. T-shirt, pants, and shoes are 3 important things that you have to pay attention at. Chestless? No way!
    • Choose a thicker fabric for your bottom clothes for its lasting. Cotton, polyester, and nylon still can be some choices as your bottom. But, choose the thicker one, okay! Right gym wear also has to breathable then it can absorb your body humidity more effective and will give cooling effect to you.
  • Wipe Your Sweat!
    • After using a bench, wipe your swear on it. So, don't forget to bring a little towel for your exercise to wipe your sweat. It's better if you use the towel on your bench as a layer. Of course, you don't want to lay down on other people sweat!
  • No Smokin' While Workin'
    • Have you seen ashtray at gym? Seldom? Well, it means no smoking at gym. How you be able doing cardio for an hour if you're smoking? Besides it's bad for yourself, the smoke is also dangerous for other people.
  • To Talk or Not To Talk
    • Imagine if you're holding 100 kilos barbell while your friend is telling you about his love story. Annoying and breaking your concentration! So, don't talk to them who are focusing and concentrate in the middle set, wait until they finish with that.
    • Don't talk too much to them who are exercising. Hey, they go to the gym for exercise, not for gossiping. And make your socialization after they finish doing exercise.
  • Mirror For Me, Mirror For You
    • The mirror around the gym isn't only for looking at yourself. The mirror also can be used to keep your balance and check your movement while exercising. So, don't block other people view who doing exercise in front of the mirror, it can break their concentration.
  • Excuse-Moi
    • Always say "excuse me" before you do exercise in other people's exercise or exactly when they finished. It's very impolite if after someone done with the bench, you suddenly use it.
    • If you want to interrupt others exercise with the same equipment, watch the weight he used. If the weight is lighter or heavier than what you want then you'd better wait for that guy finishing his exercise because it will give trouble for both of you to change the weight when you're taking turn in exercising.
  • Learn to Share
    • Don't be selfish! People won't like you! Don't monopolize a bench or a machine. In case, the gym is a little bit quite and there's no one who wants to use them, it can be allowed.
    • It works at the dispenser gym also. Don't taking a drink too long. If you're filling your bottle/drink jar/pitcher then there's someone behind you who just want to drink a glass of water, then stop your filling and let that person to take his/her water first. After that, you can continue your filling.
  • Don't be too Helpful
    • Don't you automatically come into and help someone who seems having a problem or difficulty when holding a weight. That "difficulty" sometimes is really made to push all the power to get maximal set. Your interruption actually just disturb it all. For safety, you can come close to him/her, give him/her a help if asked.
    • Don't also he a hero by offering help to hold that weight if you're actually can't lift it. Just give it to the trainer at that gym.
  • Good Smell, Train Well!
    • It's okay to use cologne or parfume to handle your bad smell but don't use it too much. It can disturb people's breathing if you use it too much. And if before doing exercise you just have another activity and already had sweated a lot, go to a shower to refresh yourself and clean your sweat. Of course, you don't want to make them unconsciousness.
  • Be Mr. Nice Guy, not Mr. Show-Off!
    • It's bad to humble other people. Don't laughing at someone who can't lift a dumbbell which is its weight is the most lightest for you! Remember that above the cloud, there's always another cloud. So, there must be someone stronger than you.
    • A person who like to show-off as also blacklisted! Compare your biseps or show-off your sixpack to everybody isn't a good way to get the popularity. It's better for you to join a body contest, besides it can be seen by all people, you can be very famous too.

From : http://www.l-men.com/13-simple-rules-of-gym-etiquette


 

Wednesday, September 2, 2009

FABRICATION PROCEDURE

Table of Contents


 

  1. Purpose -----------------------------------------------------------------    2 of 6
  2. Applicable Code, Standard and Specification -----------------    2 of 6
  3. Fabrication Sequence------------------------------------------------    2 of 6
  4. Material Receiving-----------------------------------------------------    2 of 6
  5. Nonconforming Material----------------------------------------------    3 of 6
  6. Receiving of Purchaser Supplied Product-----------------------    3 of 6
  7. Material Issuing---------------------------------------------------------    3 of 6
  8. Layout and Cutting-----------------------------------------------------    3 of 6
  9. Transfer of Heat Number---------------------------------------------    3 of 6
  10. Fit-up-----------------------------------------------------------------------    3 of 6
  11. Welding -------------------------------------------------------------------    4 of 6
  12. Control of Welding Consumable------------------------------------    4 of 6
  13. Non-Destructive Examination----------------------------------------    4 of 6
  14. Testing And Inspection -----------------------------------------------    4 of 6
  15. Painting -------------------------------------------------------------------    5 of 6
  16. Packing and Shipping preparation----------------------------------    5 of 6
  17. Manufacturing Data Book (MDR)-----------------------------------    5 of 6
  18. Appendix A – Fabrication Sequence-------------------------------    6 of 6

 

  1. Purpose

    To describe the method Synco shall adopt for fabrication and assembly of 1440 PSI – TEST SEPARATOR 20' CSC / DNV EQUIPMENT FRAME.

    To ensure the products are meet with the referenced fabrication Code and client requisition.


     

  2. Applicable Code, Standard and Specification

    All of the equipments shall be fabricated, inspected and tested in accordance with the following related specification :

    1. DNV 2.7-1 : 2006
    2. EN 12079 : 2005
    3. ISO 1496-1 (CSC)
    4. AWS D1.1 – Edition 2006


 

  1. Fabrication Sequence
    1. Approval Prototype for Design Calculation and drawing by Third Party comply CSC and DNV Code.
    2. The fabrication sequence of 1440 PSI – TEST SEPARATOR 20' CSC / DNV EQUIPMENT FRAME.
      are as per appendix A.


 

  1. Material Receiving
    1. Upon receipt of material, Store man shall spray the material with a yellow paint "hold" to await inspection by QC Inspector.
    2. The QC Inspector is responsible for verifying and inspecting all material to be used for Code fabrication against Packing List, P/O and applicable material specification, as follows:
  • Material has clear identification as required by the Code (e.g., heat number, material specification i.e. grade, type and class if applicable) and traceable to material certificate when required.
  • Contents of chemical analysis and mechanical test results on material test certificate is in accordance with the respective material specification and P/O.
  • Material is free from defects and imperfections such as pitting, scaling, lamination, etc. which would affect the safety of the Tank.
  • Additional examination required by the P/O had been performed (such as Non Destructive Examination, Heat Treatment, Impact Test and Hardness Test) and test certificates are available and in compliance with the Code and client's specification.
  • Item inspected matches with the "For Construction" drawing.
  1. All materials that have been checked by Store man and accepted by the QC Inspector shall be painted in accordance with Inspection and Test Status color-coding.
  2. The Store man and the QC Inspector shall sign Packing List or P/O (green copy) to indicate their acceptance. P/O (green copy) together with Delivery Docket/ Packing List will be forwarded to the Account Officer to match with supplier invoice.
  3. SYNCO shall give free access to the Authorized Inspector and/ or clients representative to verify material identification if necessary. The QC Inspector shall transmit material test certificate after his review/ acceptance to the Authorized Inspector and/ or client representative for their review.


 


 

  1. Nonconforming Material
    1. The QC Inspector in conjunction with Project Manager shall raise a Material Discrepancy Advice when there is discrepancy in quantity or when material test certificate is not provided with Delivery Docket.
    2. The QA/QC Manager shall raise a Non Conformance Report when receiving material with no identification, defective material and material not complying with specification. Nonconformance item shall be identified with hold/ reject tags/ paint in accordance with QM-01 section 7.
    3. The non-conforming material shall be segregated from fabrication area.


     

  2. Receiving of Purchaser Supplied Product.
    1. Upon receipt, purchaser supplied materials or items shall be subject to exactly the same level of inspection as SYNCO purchased items using packing list and material test certificates provided.


 

  1. Material Issuing
    1. Responsibility is given to the Workshop Manager or his delegate and the Store man to dispatch and receive accepted items from secured storage area.
    2. Materials for specific jobs are collectively located in job areas. The Workshop Manager or his delegate shall ensure that only the intended material is used in Code fabrication. He shall check to ensure the material has been checked by the QC Inspector with appropriate color-coding and check with the drawing for correct sizes and specification.


 

  1. Layout and Cutting
    1. Plate's layout for cutting accordance with the actual drawing.
    2. Dimension shall be verified diagonally to ensure the square ness.
    3. Plates, shape structural and other parts should be cut by oxygen cutting. Beveling shall be in accordance with construction drawing.
    4. After oxygen cutting, all slag and detrimental discoloration of material which have been molten shall be removed by grinding.
    5. Before cutting QC inspector shall inspect for correct material, sizes and heat number are properly transferred.
    6. After cutting, QC inspector shall visually inspected the cut edges for possible for laminations, shearing cracks and other imperfections.


 


 

  1. Transfer of Heat Number
    1. The Workshop Manager or his delegate is responsible for transferring heat number of plates or pipes before cutting. The method of transferring heat number shall use low stress die stamping except if prohibited by client's specification or by the Code. The remaining material to be returned to stock shall be identified with material specification and heat number marked. The QC Inspector is responsible to ensure that all material is clearly identified. Material with no identification shall not be used.


 


 

  1. Fit-up
    1. Items/ material that are being welded shall be fitted, aligned and retained in position during welding.
    2. Bars, jacks, clamps and tack welds may be used to hold the edges of parts in alignment.
    3. Tack welds, which are to be incorporated into the final weld, shall be visually examined for defects. If a defect is detected, tack weld shall be removed. The start and stop ends shall be properly prepared prior to continuing welding.
    4. Alignment during fit-up shall be maintained not to exceed Code requirements.


 


 

  1. Welding
    1. Welding Procedure Map and the WPS(s) to be used for production shall be transmitted to Workshop Manager and put on the notice board in fabrication shop for easy access to the welder and welding operators.
    2. The Workshop Manager is responsible for assigning and supervising welders for Code fabrication. He shall ensure that the assigned welders are qualified or make arrangements for their qualification. The welder and welding operator shall ensure inspection clearance status, i.e., color coding "GREEN" before embarking on any production welding.
    3. Welding may be performed from single side or double side. For double side welding second side may be prepared by grinding or carbon arc gouging and finished by grinding. In-house MT/ PT are required after back grinding or back gouging.
    4. After completion of the weld, the QC Inspector shall examine them visually. Any comment shall be marked with chalk or felt pen on location requiring subsequent work, i.e., grinding, touch-up weld, etc. After he is satisfied with his visual examination he shall initial and date in "Welding Traceability Records" form. The QC Inspector shall also use this form to record welder no, weld/ joint no. and NDE results.
    5. QC Inspector shall verify weld reinforcement and undercut are not exceed Code requirements. Fillet sizes shall be in accordance with the drawing.


 

  1. Control of Welding Consumable
    1. Electrodes and welding consumable receiving, storage and issuing shall be in accordance with procedure WCP-01 "Welding Consumable Control Procedure".
    2. Welding consumables (electrodes, wire and flux) shall be stored at temperature and humidity recommended by the electrode manufacturer.
    3. Covered low hydrogen electrode shall be baked/ re-dried from its original packing at temperature and period as per manufacturer recommendation.
    4. After baked/ re-dried covered low hydrogen electrode shall be kept in holding oven at a temperature recommended by manufacturer.
    5. Low hydrogen electrode shall be issued to the welders from holding oven to their individual quiver.


 

  1. Non-Destructive Examination
    1. NDE shall be performed in accordance with approved "NDE Map and NDE Procedure" and ITP.


 

  1. Testing and Inspection
    1. On completion of fabrication, the QC Inspector shall perform final dimensional check and visual examination of welds and all surfaces before Load and Proof test. Synco will invite Authorized Inspector and Client Inspector for final inspection before proof test for final visual and dimensional inspection.
    2. The Authorized Inspector shall make his final visual inspection before proof test. He shall sign and date ITP package, when he is satisfied that the 1440 PSI – TEST SEPARATOR 20' CSC / DNV EQUIPMENT FRAME meets the applicable Code requirements. The QA/QC Manager shall ensure that all NCRs are properly closed before proof test.
    3. Testing shall be conducted in accordance with CSC / DNV requirement
    4. Prototype testing include:
      1. 4 Lifting points test
      2. 2 Lifting points test
      3. Drop Test
      4. Longitudinal and lateral inertia test
      5. Longitudinal restraint test
      6. Transverse Racking
      7. Stacking Test
      8. Top Corner ISO Lifting Points Test
      9. Bottom Corner Lifting Points Test
      10. Lifting Test – Forklift Pockets


     

  2. Painting
    1. Surface Preparation and Painting shall be conducted in accordance with approved procedure.


 

  1. Packing and Shipping preparation
    1. Packing and shipping preparation shall be in accordance with procedure


     

  2. Manufacturing Data Book (MDR)
    1. All material test certificates and inspection reports shall be compiled progressively by QC Inspector.
    2. The contents of MDR shall be in accordance with "Manufacturing Data Report Index - Table of Content".


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     

Appendix A – Fabrication Sequence


Arctic SteelsCriteria for safe materials utilisation

Arctic Steels

Criteria for safe materials utilisation

by


 

Christian Thaulow

Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway

christian.thaulow@ntnu.no


 

Jack Ødegård and Erling Østby

SINTEF Materials and Chemistry, Trondheim, Norway


 

Abstract

The development of arctic oil and gas fields will require new low temperature High Strength Steels, including welding, and integrity management capable of significantly reducing the probability of failure in critical extreme environments. In addition to low temperatures, also larger strains must be accounted for because of iceberg scours ,thaw settlement and landslides . In order to allow for a high utilisation of the new arctic steels and at the same time increase the level of safety ("zero-leakage" and "maintenance-free" solutions), relevant material test methods and acceptance criteria must be available. Constraint corrections and direct calculations based on linespring technology opens up for realistic quantitative assessments of failures. One example is the calculation of probability of failure based of probabilistic fracture mechanics methodologies


 

1. INTRODUCTION

Back in the 80-ties large thematic programs were conducted on steel research and development in order to meet the new challenges brought forward by the oil and gas exploration and production on the Norwegian Continental Shelf.

Oil and gas exploration in Arctic regions puts new and harsh requirements to competence and technology development as new materials will be introduced into new environments. In order to meet the standards for safe exploration and operation, new step changes have to be made. The most reliable and robust technology have to be developed as "zero-leakage", and "maintenance-free" solutions must be sought and qualified.

The development of arctic oil and gas fields will require new low temperature High Strength Steels, including welding, and integrity management capable of significantly reducing the probability of failure in critical extreme environments.


 

Special Arctic environment conditions

Air temperature – Steels are susceptible to brittle fracture at low temperatures. In general the materials are qualified at so-called "design temperatures", which typically lies 20°C below minimum expected service and/or ambient temperature. The lowest ambient temperature on the Norwegian continental shelf is about -20°C, and the design basis for the Snøhvit project is -23°C. In the Arctic regions, minimum ambient temperatures well below -40°C must be expected. Consequently minimum design temperatures down to - 60°C must be accounted for.


 

Larger deformations – Present pipeline design rules are stress-based, and only limited strains are allowed for, typically up to 0.5%. However, larger deformations/strains are expected in the Arctic for a range of reasons: thaw settlement and frost heave, landslides, iceberg scours (up to 10 meters deep), strains far beyond the yielding limit of the materials are out of range of today's design rules, Figure 1. Steel constructions in arctic marine regions are exposed to heavy wind and ice-loads, which must be taken into account. In combination with extreme low temperatures this puts the toughest requirements to the structures and their functionality and lifetime integrity.


 



 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 

Figure 1 Range of deformations for pipelines

2. Steel research at NTNU/SINTEF for the Norwegian continental shelf

There has been a continuous development and application of new materials coupled with fundamental understanding of the material properties and development of predictive tools. Before 1980 the materials used in offshore industry were based on materials qualities from the ship industry and general structural engineering. Nothing was developed or specified with respect to the extreme and harsh conditions that are characterizing the North Sea.


 

In 1980 there was a break through for new steels developed to meet the demands from the offshore industry. The fabrication yards had for some time demanded more fabrication friendly materials with respect to weldability and fracture toughness. The result was the so-called low carbon micro alloyed steels, which were standardized in 1984.


 

The first full-scale application of the steel was for the Odin platform. But, surprisingly, areas of the heat affected zone showed low toughness, and large research projects were carried out in order to understand the problem of "local brittle zones". The Norwegian Petroleum Directorate was very concerned about the safety, and a long lasting cooperation with SINTEF/NTNU was established. This resulted in the so-called NPD testing procedure. More than 30 steels were tested and the development in welding/fracture toughness could be compared and commented upon.


 

Norway, with very limited domestic steel manufacturing industry, negotiated with the international steel manufacturers in order to find the balance between what is possible to manufacture (to an acceptable price) and what is needed for a fabrication friendly and safe offshore structure. Other countries often have to take special considerations in order to "protect" or help their national steel industry and are therefore more limited in their choices.


 

One example of this unique situation is the cooperation with Japanese steel industry. This industry has for a long time been very innovative, and they have delivered steel to a range of offshore structures and pipelines. In 1990 a Norwegian-Japanese Cooperation was established between the five large Japanese steel manufacturers, Norwegian oil companies and fabrication yards, Osaka University and SINTEF/NTNU. The aim with the project was to qualify the new high strength steels (yield strength 420-500 MPa) for offshore application and to develop realistic acceptance criteria. It was for the first time that so many Japanese steels works cooperated, and it was created a "win-win" meeting place between manufacturers and users. The cooperation included exchange of researchers for longer periods, up to two years, and numerous seminars, workshops and joint papers in international journals.


 

The driving force for introducing high strength steels has been the potential for weight reductions and the gains have been so high that the offshore industry continuously has asked for material qualities that have not yet been standardised. In order to qualify the steels and their weldments, and to prepare for future standardization, the industries have sponsored both basic and applied R&D programs, Table 1. These programs are usually organized to bring steel manufacturers, welding companies, fabricators, engineering companies and the oil companies together.


 

Table 1. Research projects at NTNU/SINTEF on Fracture Control for Offshore Applications.

CAOS "Crack Arrest Offshore Steels" (1986-1990). SINTEF/NTNU. Joint Industry Project (JIP), with one Japanese and one European steel-manufacturer and offshore industry.


 

Norwegian-Japanese cooperation program (1990-1994), Osaka University and SINTEF/NTNU.
JIP with 5 Japanese steelmakers and Norwegian industry, supported by NRC (Norwegian research council).


 

ACCRIS "Acceptance Criteria and Level of Safety for High Strength Steel Weldments" (1994-1997). SINTEF/NTNU. JIP, supported by ECSC (European Coal and Steel Community) and NRC


 

PRESS "Prediction of Structural Behavior on the Basis of Small Scale Testing." (1998-2002). SINTEF/NTNU. JIP, supported by ECSC and NRC


 

Fracture Control Offshore Pipelines (2002-2006). SINTEF/NTNU. JIP, supported by NRC


 


 

As a result of this kind of research new steel qualities with low alloying content and high weldability has been developed, and a high level of safety has been maintained despite for the increased strength level (which will generally increase the stresses and thereby reduce the critical defect sizes).


 

During the last ten years mathematical modelling and FE calculations have developed from research tools to be used in practice. The predictive capacity has improved as new material qualities and strength levels are introduced. The development from steel grade 350 to 460 has continued, and the Grane platform was recently built with 500 steel. This progress has been made possible through the research projects over the years. And the development continues in various directions. One example is the research project PRESS where steel grade 700 has been examined. Such high strength steels were applied in the Siri platform.

3. Criteria for safe materials utilisation

For safe materials utilisation the brittle fracture phenomena is a focused area. The state-of-the-art today is represented by a micromechanical approach to model the initiation of cleavage fracture. A new approach in quantifying the constraint effect, e.g. the fracture toughness dependency on geometry, loading and material mismatch, is the so-called JQM Approach (1, 2).


 

Much of to-days methodologies for Crack Arrest relates back two the Battelle approach which was first presented by Maxey in 1974. The approach is based on empirical relationships and simplified equations, and has proved to be robust to date, even when stretched far beyond the empirical basis. However, the operational characteristics currently being considered for future pipeline designs range far beyond any conditions that have been investigated in the past (higher pressure, higher strength materials/welds, rich gas, lower operating temperatures, frost heave, thaw settlement….). There is also a strong need to improve current gas-decompression models to account for the future pipeline designs.


 

To account for large deformations, Figure 1, a framework for strain-based design of pipelines is now under development (3-7).


 

4. Constraint based design and direct calculations

Today's practice in fracture mechanics testing is to ensure a conservative approach by recommending the use of test specimen geometries with high constraint (deeply notched bend- or compact tension specimens). This approach, however, can put severe limitations on the application of high strength steels. By applying constraint corrections, e.g. the T-stress or the Q-parameter, more accurate predictions can be achieved, and the safety aspect can then be managed by introducing safety factors, Figure 2. The thick line represents the fracture toughness (eg. the material property), while the thin lines represents the applied crack driving force. The structure is expected to fracture when the applied force exceeds the material resistance.


 

Figure 2 also includes a pipe subjected to bending load. The pipe-geometry exhibits typically much lower constraint than the fracture mechanics SENB-specimens, and revisions of the rules have recently been published in favour of including the SENT specimen geometry for engineering critical assessments of installation of pipes (8). SENT specimens have not yet been qualified for operational conditions, due to limited information about the effect of biaxial loading (internal pressure). But results from SINTEF shows that internal pressure has no influence on the fracture toughness for ductile materials, which means that SENT specimens can be used for establishing fracture properties also under conditions of operation (7).


 

The procedure of constraint correction works well theoretically, and many papers have demonstrated a sound physical basis. A major drawback for the practical application is, however, the need for detailed FE calculations or detailed knowledge of the theories. So, new methodologies where high accuracy can be maintained without introducing complex or costly calculations are needed. Direct calculations of components based on a combination of shell- elements and linesprings, LINKpipe, has demonstrated to meet this challenge (9-13).


 

LINKpipe is a state-of-the-art software-tool for analysis of the criticality of cracks and defects in pipelines and piping systems. The program simulates external and internal surface cracks in pipelines under tensile, bending and internal/external pressure. In LINKpipe the geometry of an elliptical surface crack is represented by so-called linespring elements. The linespring is implemented in a co-rotated kinematical finite element formulation, i.e. accounting for large displacements and rotations. The program also accounts for plastic necking of the ligament and non-proportional loading. The linespring calculations have been verified by 3D FE calculations and full scale testing of pipes, with and without internal pressure.


 


 


 


 


 



 

Figure 2 Schematic representation of fracture toughness as a function of constraint for three test specimens and a pipe-geometry.


 

In Figure 3a we compare the result of the linespring/shell-elements with 3D large strain FE calculations for a pipe . The results are very similar, except for the time of calculation: LINKpipe is 600 times faster.


 

Shown in Figure 4 are the results obtained from the tensile loading of a surface cracked pipe with additional internal pressure. The magnitude of pressure is marked as the ratio of hoop stress caused by the internal pressure to the initial yield stress. As the internal pressure increases, the unstable tearing begins at lower values of deformation. In other words, the deformation capacity of the cracked pipe is significantly reduced under biaxial loading.


 

Concluding remarks

In order to allow for a high utilisation of the new arctic steels and at the same time increase the level of safety ("zero-leakage" and "maintenance-free" solutions), relevant test methods and acceptance criteria must be available. The application of constraint corrections and the introduction of direct calculations pave the way for quantitative assessments of failure. One example is the calculation of probability of failure based of probabilistic fracture mechanics methodologies (6).


 


 


 


 


 

Figure 3 CTOD vs. strain for a pipe with an elliptical surface crack. The pipe dimensions are OD=400mm, WT=20mm. The crack is halfway through the thickness. The computation times for the 3D and linespring calculations are indicated.


 



 

Figure 4 The effect of internal pressure, combined with ductile tearing, on the applied CTOD vs. global strain. Surface cracked pipe under tension load.


 

References

1. Zhang, Z.L., Hauge, M. and Thaulow, C.: "Two Parameter Characterisation of the Near Tip Stress Fields for a Bi-Material Elastic-Plastic Interface Crack", Int. Journal of Fracture, 79:65-83, 1996.


 

2. Thaulow, C., Zhang, Z.L., Ranestad, Ø. and Hauge,M., "J-Q-M approach for failure assessment of fusion line cracks: two material and three material models". ASTM STP 1360, Fatigue and Fracture Mechanics: 30th Volume. St.Louis. June 1998


 

3. Bruschi, R., Torselletti, E., Vitali, L., Hauge, M., Levold, E. Fracture Control – Offshore Pipelines: Current Status of Fracture Assessment for Pipelines Limitations and the Need for Development. Proceedings of OMAE2005, 24th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering (OMAE 2005), June 12-16, 2005, Halkidiki, Greece


 

4. Østby, E., "Fracture Control – Offshore Pipelines: New Strain-Based Fracture Mechanics Equations Including the Effects of Biaxial Loading, Mismatch and Misalignment", Ibid


 

5. Thaulow C, Skallerud B, Jayadevan KR, Berg E, Fracture Control – Offshore Pipelines: Advantages of Using Direct Calculations in Fracture Assessments of Pipelines. Ibid


 

6. Sandvik A, Østby E, Naess A, Sigurdsson G, Thaulow C. Fracture Control – Offshore Pipelines: Probabilistic Fracture Assessment of Circumferentially Surface Cracked Ductile Pipelines Using Analytical Equations, Ibid


 

7. Nyhus B, Østby E, Knagenhjelm HO, Black S, Røstadsand PA. Fracture Control – Offshore Pipelines: Experimental Studies On The Effect Of Crack Depth And Asymmetrical Geometries On The Ductile Tearing Resistance, Ibid


 

8. Wästberg, S. Pisarski, H. and Nyhus, B., "Guidelines For Engineering Critical Assessments for Pipeline Installation Methods Introducing Cyclic Plastic Strain", Proceedings of OMAE04, 23rd International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, June 20–25, 2004, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada


 

9. Skallerud B, Holthe K and Haugen B., (2005). "Thin shell and surface crack finite elements for simulation of combined failure modes". Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engng. 194, 2619-2640


 

10. Thaulow C, Østby E, Nyhus B, Zhang Z L and Skallerud B (2004). "Constraint correction of high strength steel: Selection of test specimens and application of direct calculations". Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 71, 2417-2433


 

11. Skallerud B, Berg E, and Jayadevan KR (2006), "Two-parameter fracture assessment of surface cracked cylindrical shells during collapse", Engineering Fracture Mechanics 73, 264-282


 

12. Jayadevan, K.R., Thaulow, C., Østby, E., Berg, E., Skallerud, B., Holthe, K., Nyhus, B., (2005). "Structural Integrity of Pipelines: T-stress by line-spring". Fatigue Fract Engng Mater Struct, 28, 467-488.


 

13. Jayadevan K R, Berg E, Thaulow C. ,Østby E. and Skallerud B. (2006) "Numerical investigation of ductile tearing in surface cracked pipes using line-spring". Int. J. Solids and Structures, 43, 2378-2397

Monday, July 6, 2009

W E L D E R ‘ SH A N D B O O K

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. WELD DEFECTS, CAUSES AND CURE    

    A. Weld Spatter    3 –4

    B. Overlap    4

    C. Underfill    4

    D. Arc Strikes    5

    E. Undercut    5

    F. Porosity    6 – 7

    G. Slag Inclusion    7 – 8

    H. Burn-Through    8

    I. Internal Concavity    9

    J. Incomplete Fusion    9 – 10

    K. Incomplete Root Penetration    11

    L. Excessive Reinforcement    11 – 12

    M. Excessive Penetration    12

    N. Cracking    13 – 14

    O. Tungsten Inclusion    15

    P. Insufficient Leg Size    15

II. ACCEPTABLE AND UNACCEPTABLE WELD PROFILES

    A. Desirable Fillet Weld Profiles    16

    B. Acceptable Fillet Weld Profiles    16

    C. Unacceptable Fillet Weld Profiles    17

    D. Acceptable Groove Weld Profile in Butt Joint    17

    E. Unacceptable Groove Weld Profiles in Butt Joints    18

    F. Tubular T, K, & Y Connections    18

        1. Figure 3.8 – Standard Flat Profiles    19

        2. Figure 3.9 – Profile with Toe Fillets    20

        3. Figure 3.10 – Concave Improved Profile    21

        4. Table 3.6 – Pre-qualified Joint Dimensions    22

III. WELDING POSITIONS

  1. Plate

    1. Groove    23 - 24

    2. Fillet    24 – 25


     

TABLE OF CONTENTS (continuation…)


 


 

  1. Pipe

    1. Groove    26 - 28

    2. Fillet    28 – 30

IV. HANDLING, STORAGE AND TREATMENT OF WELDING

            CONSUMABLES

    A. SMAW Consumables Other Than Low Hydrogen    30

    B. Low Hydrogen Consumables    31

    C. SAW FLUX    32

V. PREHEAT AND INTERPASS TEMPERATURE    33

VI. WELDMENT DISTORTION CONTROL    34 – 36

VII. BASIC MECHANICAL TESTINGS AND THE FACTORS

        AFFECTING THE TEST RESULTS    36 - 37

VIII. APPROVED WPS

  1. Structural Fabrication
  2. Piping Fabrication


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 

  1. WELD DEFECTS, CAUSES AND CURE


 

  1. Weld Spatter


 

Sketch:


 


 


 


 


 


 


 

Causes:

  1. Current too high.
  2. Wrong Polarity.
  3. Arc length too long.
  4. Presence of arc blow.
  5. Wet electrodes


 

    Cure:

  1. Try lowering the current. Be sure the current is within the range for the type and diameter of the electrode.
  2. Be sure the polarity is correct for the electrode type.
  3. Try a shorter arc length.
  4. If the molten metal is running in front of the arc, change the electrode angle.
  5. Look for arc blow conditions, and control it as follows;
    1. Change to AC welding.
    2. Use lower current and smaller electrodes.
    3. Try reducing the arc length.
    4. Weld in the direction of the blow.
    5. Change the electrical path to work by:
      1. Shifting the work connection to the other end of the work or making connections in several locations.
      2. Welding toward heavy tacks, finished welds, or back-stepping on long welds.
      3. Using run-out tabs, adding steel blocks to change work current path, or tacking small plates across the seam at weld ends.
  6. Observe the proper handling of welding electrode.


 

  1. Overlap

    Sketch:


     


     


     


     


     


     


     

    Causes:

    1. Welding current too low and travel speed too slow.
    2. Contaminated base metal.


     

    Cure:

    1. Increase the welding current and the travel speed.
    2. Clean the joint properly.


     

C. Underfill

Sketch:


 


 


 


 


 


 


 

Causes:

  1. Failure to fill the joint completely prior to the deposition of the cap pass.


 

Cure:

  1. Fill the joint up to the base metal thickness or at least 1mm below prior to the deposition of cap pass.
  1. Arc Strikes

        Sketch:


 


 


 


 


 


 


 

Cause:

  1. Carelessness of the welder.

Cure:

  1. Properly secure all ground connections, welding cables and electrode handle/gun.


 

  1. Undercut

    Sketch:


     

    Causes:

    1. Current too high.
    2. Wrong electrode angle.

    Cure:

    1. Decrease the current and the travel speed.
    2. Change electrode angle so the arc force holds the metal in the corners. Use a uniform travel speed, and avoid excessive weaving.
  2. Porosity

    Sketch:


     


 


 


 


 


 

    
 


 


 


 

  1. Cluster Porosity

    Causes:

    1. Unstable or poor shielding.
    2. Improper initiation or termination of weld.


     

    Cure:

    1. Keep the arc length as close as possible.
    2. For the initiation of the arc, use the back-stepping method to re-melt the cold start area and float the gas out of the bead. Whenever possible, use tab plates on each end of the joint.


     

  2. Piping/Wormhole Porosity

    Causes:

    1. Contaminated base metal.
    2. Poor or unstable shielding i.e. poor moisture and wind protection, too long arc length, unstable electrode manipulation.
    3. The electrodes absorbed moisture.


     

    Cure:

    1. Observe proper cleaning of the joint for welding.
    2. Keep the arc length as close as possible.
    3. Avoid too wide weaving.
    4. Install proper wind protection on the work area.
    5. Observe the proper handling of welding electrode.
    6. For GTAW process, increase the shielding gas flow rate as required. Also, check the gas hose and connections for possible leakage.


 

  1. Slag Inclusion

    Sketch:


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     

    Causes:

    1. Poor inter-pass cleaning.
    2. Current too low.
    3. Unstable electrode manipulation
    4. Groove angle too narrow.
    5. Weld beads too convex.


     

    Cure:

    1. Observe proper inter-pass cleaning.
    2. Increase the current.
    3. Correct the too convex bead by grinding.


 

  1. Burn-Through

    Sketch:


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     

    Causes:

    1. Too wide root gap, and too short root face.


     

    Cure:

    1. Correct the joint preparation.
    2. Decrease the current, and increase the welding speed.


 


 


 


 


 

  1. Internal Concavity

    Sketch:


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


 

Causes:

  1. Higher current.
  2. Arc length too long.
  3. Root gap too wide, and groove angle too narrow.

Cure:

  1. Decrease the current, increase the welding speed.
  2. Make arc length as close as possible.
  3. Correct the joint preparation.


 

  1. Incomplete Fusion


     

    Causes:

    1. Groove angle too narrow.
    2. Welding speed too high.
    3. Weld beads too irregular.


 

Cure:

  1. Increase the current and decrease the welding speed.
  2. Correct the joint preparation.
  3. Correct the irregular bead by grinding.


 


 


 


 

Sketch:


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 

  1. Incomplete Root Penetration

    Sketch:


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     

    Causes:

    1. Current too low.
    2. Arc length too long.
    3. Improper joint preparation i.e. root face too long, root gap too narrow, groove angle too narrow.


     

    Cure:

    1. Increase the current.
    2. Make arc length as short as possible.
    3. Correct the joint preparation.


 

  1. Excessive Reinforcement


     

    Causes:

    1. Welding speed too slow.
    2. Improper welding technique.

    Cure:

    1. Increase the welding speed.
    2. Grind the excess thickness of the last layer to base metal prior to deposition of cap pass.
    3. Use the proper size of welding electrode.

    Sketch:


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     

  2. Excessive Penetration


 

Sketch:


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 

Causes:

  1. Root gap too wide, and root face too short.
  2. Current too high.


 

Cure:

  1. Correct the joint preparation.
  2. Decrease the current, and increase the travel speed.


 


 

  1. Cracking

    Sketch:


 


 


 


 

  1. Cold Cracks (Toe/Underbead Cracks)

    Causes:

    1. Rapid cooling from the welding temperature of a relatively high carbon or alloy content steel.
    2. Hydrogen pick-up during welding.
    3. The joint is so restrained.


 

Cure:

  1. Use low hydrogen welding electrodes.
    1. Observe proper handling of electrodes, and cleanliness of the joint for welding.
  2. Preheat the joint to reduce the cooling rate, and maintain the inter-pass temperature.
  3. Reduce penetration by using low currents, small electrodes. This reduces the amount of alloy added to the weld from melted base metal.
  4. For GTAW process, check the gas hose and connections for possible leaks. Verify also the purity of shielding gas and change with a higher grade if found necessary.


 

  1. Hot Cracks (Crater/Throat/Root Cracks)

    Causes:

    1. Wrong welding technique.


     

    Cure:

    1. To control crater cracking, fill each crater before breaking the arc.
    2. On multiple pass or fillet welds, be sure the first bead is of sufficient size and of flat or convex shape to resist cracking until the later beads can be added for support. To increase bead size, use slower travel speed, a short arc, or weld
      5O uphill. Always continue welding while the plate is hot.
    3. For rigid joints, whenever possible, weld towards the unrestrained end. Leave at least 1/32" gap between plates for free shrinkage as the weld cools.
  1. Tungsten Inclusion (GTAW Process)

    Sketch:


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     

    Cause:

    1. Accidental touching of the tungsten electrode to the weld puddle.


 

Cure:

  1. Avoid contact of the tungsten electrode with the molten weld puddle.


 

  1. Insufficient Leg Size (Fillet Welds)

        Sketch:


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 

        Cause:

  1. Incorrect electrode angle.
  2. Improper welding technique.

        Cure:

  1. Use the correct electrode angle.
  2. For multi-pass fillet welds, follow the proper weld pass sequence to attain the required leg size.
  3. Use the correct diameter of the electrode for each pass.
  1. ACCEPTABLE AND UNACCEPTABLE WELD PROFILES


 

  1. DESIRABLE FILLET WELD PROFILES


 

    W

    


 


 

Size    Size


 


 


 

        Size    Size    C


 

  1. ACCEPTABLE FILLET WELD PROFILES

    C

        W

    W    

    W    

    

Size    Size


 


 

    C    C

        Size    Size    


 


 

Note: Convexity "C" of a weld or individual surface bead with dimension "W" shall not exceed the following value;


 


 

Width of Weld Face or

Individual Surface Bead, W 


 

Maximum Convexity, C 

W < 5/16" (8mm)

W > 5/16" (8mm) to W < 1 IN. (25mm)

W > 1" (25mm) 

1/16" (2mm)

1/8" (3mm)

3/16" (5mm) 

  1. UNACCEPTABLE FILLET WELD PROFILES


 


 


 


 


 


 

        SIZE    SIZE    SIZE


 

     INSUFFICIENT    EXCESSIVE    EXCESSIVE

     THROAT    CONVEXITY    UNDERCUT


 


 


 


 


 


 

    SIZE    SIZE    SIZE

    

    OVERLAP    INSUFFICIENT    INCOMPLETE

        LEG        FUSION


 

  1. ACCEPTABLE GROOVE WELD PROFILE IN BUTT JOINT

    R


 

    T1


 

    R

    BUTT JOINT – EQUAL THICKNESS PLATE


 


 

    R


 


 


 

    BUTT JOINT (TRANSITION) – UNEQUAL THICKNESS PLATE


 


 

Note: Reinforcement "R" shall not exceed 1/8 in. (3 mm).

  1. UNACCEPTABLE GROOVE WELD PROFILES IN BUTT JOINTS


 


 


 

    EXCESSIVE    INSUFFICIENT

    CONVEXITY    THROAT


 


 


 

    

    EXCESSIVE    OVERLAP

    UNDERCUT


 


 

  1. TUBULAR T, K & Y CONNECTIONS


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 

Note:

  1. See Table 3.6 for dimensions tw, L, R, W, w, f.
  2. Min. standard flat weld profile as shown by solid line.
  3. A concave profile as shown by dashed lines, as applicable.


 


 


 


 

NOTE:

(1) See Table 3.6 for dimensions tw, L, R, W, w, f.

(2) Min. standard flat weld profile as shown by solid line.

(3) A concave profile as shown by dashed lines, as applicable.


 


 


 


 


 

Note:

(1) See Table 3.6 for dimensions tw, L, R, W, w, f.


 


 


 


 


 


 

  1. WELDING POSITIONS


 

  1. PLATE
    1. Groove
      1. Flat Position (1G)

                Plates Horizontal

  1. Horizontal Posiiton (2G)


 

    Plates vertical; axis of weld horizontal

  1. Vertical Position (3G)


 

Plates vertical; axis of weld vertical

  1. Overhead Position (4G)

                Plates Horizontal


 

  1. Fillet


 

  1. Flat Position (1F)


 


 

  1. Horizontal Position (2F)

        Note: One plate must be horizontal

  1. Vertical Position (3F)


 


 

  1. Overhead Position (4F)


 

            Note: One plate must be horizontal.


 


 


 


 


 


 


 

  1. PIPE


 

  1. Groove
    1. 1G Rotated – pipe horizontal and rotated, weld flat (+15O), deposit filler metal at or near the top.


     

    Pipe horizontal and rotated. Weld flat (+15O). Deposit filler metal at or near the top.


     

    1. 2G – pipe or tube vertical and not rotated during welding, weld horizontal (+15O).


     

    Pipe or tube vertical and not rotated during welding. Weld horizontal (+15O).

    1. 5G – pipe or tube horizontal fixed (+15O) and not rotated during welding. Weld flat, vertical and overhead.


       

      Pipe or tube horizontal fixed (+15OC) and not rotated during welding. Weld flat, vertical and overhead.


     

    1. 6G - pipe inclination fixed (45O
      +5O) and not rotated during welding.    

      Pipe inclination fixed (45O
      +5O) and not rotated during welding.


     


     


     


     


     


     


     


     

    1. 6GR – test position for T, K, Y connections. Pipe inclination fixed (45O
      +5O), with restriction ring and not rotated during welding.


     

  2. Fillet


 

  1. 1F ROTATED – flat position


 


 

  1. 2F FIXED - horizontal position


 

  1. 2F ROTATED – horizontal position


 


 

  1. 4F FIXED - overhead position


 

  1. 5F FIXED – multiple position


 

  1. HANDLING, STORAGE AND TREATMENT OF WELDING CONSUMABLES


 

  1. SMAW WELDING CONSUMABLES OTHER THAN LOW HYDROGEN


 


 

CLASSIFICATION


 

TRADE NAME 


 

BAKE - OUT 


 

HANDLING 


 

E7010


 

LINCOLN SHIELD ARC HYP


 

NONE 


 

SEE NOTE "N1" 


 

E6027


 

CHOSUN CF 120

ESAB E6027


 

NONE 


 

SEE NOTE "N1" 


 

E2XX-15 and

E3XX-16*


 

ALL 


 

NONE 


 

SEE NOTE "N1"


 

ECuNi


 

ALL 


 

NONE 


 

SEE NOTE "N1) 

Note:

N1 – must be stored in a clean, dry area.

* - Arosta brand consumables requires baking when not packaged in hermetically sealed containers. See Item 2 below.

  1. LOW HYDROGEN WELDING CONSUMABLES


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 

Note:

  1. Applicable for the following electrodes:
    1. E316 –1 (Arosta), when not from hermetically sealed container.
    2. E347 (Arosta), when not from hermetically sealed container.
    3. E7016 (Kobelco LB-52U)
    4. E7018-1 (Lincoln LH75)
    5. E9018 (Tech Rod)
    6. E11018 (Tech Rod)


     

  2. Undamaged electrodes = no dirt, moisture, oil and the flux remains intact.


 


 


 


 


 


 


 

  1. SAW FLUX


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 

  1. PREHEAT AND INTERPASS TEMPERATURE


 

  1. Purpose of Preheating
    1. To slow down the cooling rate, and allow more time for hydrogen, that is present, to diffuse away from the weld and adjacent plate.
    2. To reduce shrinkage stresses in the weld and adjacent base metal, especially withhighly restrained joints.
    3. To slow down the cooling rate through the critical temperature range (1600OF to 1330OF), preventing excessive hardening and lowering ductility of both weld and heat affected zone.


     

  2. Problems Encountered When Proper Preheating is not Observed
    1. Weld Cracking


     

  3. Required Preheat and Interpass Temperature
    1. As specified in the approved WPS.


     

  4. Required Preheat Areas
    1. Min. 3 inches (75mm) in all directions from the point of welding.


     

  5. Method of Preheating
    1. Torch Heating
    2. Ceramic Heating Element


     

  6. Means of Monitoring the Temperatures
    1. Temperature Indicating Crayons
    2. Portable Pyrometers
    3. Thermocouples


     


     


     


     

    1. WELDMENT DISTORTION CONTROL


 

  1. Avoid overwelding.


 


 


 


 


 

    T


 


 

    T

    


 

  1. Use intermittent welding.


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 

  1. Use as few weld passes as possible.


 

        Good


 


 


 

        Poor


 


 


 

  1. Use backstep welding.


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 

  1. Prebending the parts to be welded


 

        


 

        Weld


 


 


 

        Wedge


 


 


 

        Clamps along edges


 

  1. Plan the welding sequence.


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 

        
 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 

  1. Minimize welding time. Use the welding process and electrodes that able to finish the weld quickly.


 

  1. BASIC MECHANICAL TESTING AND THE FACTORS AFFECTING THE TEST RESULTS


 


 

  1. Tensile Test – the testing used to determine the strength of the weldment to resist pulling forces.

        Factors affecting the test results:

    1. welding electrodes – the tensile strength of the welding electrodes must be greater than the min. tensile strength of the base metal


     

  2. Bend Test – the testing used to determine the strength of the weldment to resist bending forces.

        Factors affecting the test results:

    1. Weld discontinuities such as inclusions, porosities, incomplete fusion, etc. that may cause openings beyond the acceptance criteria after bending.

      (See Section I for the causes of weld defects.)


       

  3. Impact Test – the testing used to determine the strength of the weldment to absorb the energy of the load rapidly applied to the member.

        Factors affecting the test results:

    1. Weaving of electrodes beyond the maximum requirements.
    2. Interpass temperatures beyond the maximum allowable.


     

  4. Hardness Test – the testing used to determine the property of the weldment to resist indentation or penetration.

        Factors affecting the test results:

    1. Not enough preheat temperature.


 

  1. Macro-etch Test – the testing used to verify the soundness of weld.

        Factors affecting the test results:

    1. Weld discontinuities such as lack of fusion, inclusions, porosities, etc. that beyond the acceptance criteria.

      (See Section I for the causes of weld defects.)